Why go to Vienna, Austria for cancer treatment?
First of all: There are a lot of working therapies that are almost completely unknown! We looked for them and we use them. It seems that chemotherapy benefits from a world wide protection. The strategy seems to be to give people as much chemotherapy as possible until they die. So other therapies (especially working therapies) are banned and also very seldom known. We collected those together. They work! We have therapies that work quickly and stop cancer quickly - and we have therapies that need more time (to change the milieu).
The second fact: we do not have an expensive clinic to finance, we are only serving ambulant patients. So we have no need to "sell you as much therapy as possible" but our main attention is free to serve and satisfy cancer patients.
Please understand our efforts well:
We change the mileu to create a cancer hostile environment in the organism. It could be that our quickly working methods of reducing and eliminationg cancer work well (what they mostly do) - nevertheless we need a cancer hostile environment in order to establish and obtain real health.
Also after surgery: If your tumor has not been completely removed by surgery (or if that is uncertain) you have to get the system into balance again! If one does not do that tumors will always grow because the system is out of balance and demands the growth!
Here - by the way - lies the reason why "usual" cancer therapies are so unsuccessful after first surgery has not been a complete success: Because they do not address the system to get back control over growth factors. Most people then die within 5 years despite of a lot of treatment or because of it. The missing element is restoring the system.
There is a point in cancer therapy that has to be made clear to the patient: Cancer is not a special illness, it is not much different from other illnesses, - except for the fact that the person dies if he or she does the wrong thing.
What I mean to say: In rheumatic or other diseases the patient can go and try this and try that and he is still alive. Probably one day he finds a solution.
But a cancer patient cannot go "and see if chemo works"! When he sees that chemo does not work it is very often too late. It is my honest personal opinion that the worldwide "chemo-network" only can continue to exist because the patients die and cannot make a revolt or demand some better therapy.
Chemotherapy has an official healing rate of 2 - 4 percent. What do you want with this? Why try? It is already known that it does not work. Since 50 years. At least since President Nixon had to admit that he lost his "war on cancer".
In Addition to that: if you take into account that those 2 - 4 percent (destroying cancer tissue completely by chemo) only concern a few types of cancer like testis, M. Hodgkin and (seldom) leukaemia. There it works. That sums up to 2 - 4 percent healing rate. What is left for all the above usual "normal" every-day-cancers? Probably 1 percent if we mean it well? Why try chemo on a normal cancer? It is known to be useless for healing.
A cancer patient should know that. He should know that - in his progressed stage of cancer (which is: could not been removed by surgery or radiation at the beginning) - doctors do chemo only for the purpose of life extension, mostly for gaining a few weeks. So if you want that: then you are right doing chemo.
"Real healing":
I must admit that there is no promise that one will make it through a "real-healing-effort". There is no guarantee, especially because most patients have been treated contrary to healing by chemo or other treatments. Chemo will always bring the system further away from healing. It turned out that especially hormones like cortisone, tamoxiphen, aromatase-blocker etc. bring the system even more out of balance than chemo.
So we found that patients have the best chance without having gotten much other treatment and of course with small cancers. Surgical removal is a good thing because one has then a small cancer and one has more time.
Some theory about "real healing":
In an organism all control functions are held in balance by two antagonistic forces. If for instance the blood sugar should be held on a certain level "hormone A" will push it high while "hormone B" will press it down. Those 2 forces produce the right level.
In the autonomous nerve system we have very similar conditions: "sympathicus" will work against "parasympathicus" in order to bring about a certain balance to match environmental needs.
If one of these antagonistic forces become too weak the levelling would become impossible. Order then breaks down. In case of the blood sugar example we get diabetes mellitus because insulin is not any more there or too weak. The balance breaks down and the illness takes place.
In case of cancer we have levelling forces within the hormone system and the vegetative nerve system and the immune system that can have broken down and gone out of balance. The command "grow up quickly and multiply" will act without the counter effort and without being stopped. If we look at a stomach ulcer (where we have a lack of tissue, a wound) the command "grow up quickly and multiply" is a necessary and useful thing. When the healing of the ulcer is completed the cells then will get the command "stop multiplying but feed cells to become strong". These two antagonistic forces or commands level those cell functions. If the latter becomes weak the "grow command" will not stop in an orderly way but become a danger. If it becomes generally weakened one can then get unstopped growth in an area of often needed regeneration. That is then the location of cancer.
Why and when current "school medicine" is unsuccessful: If - in a healing effort - one concentrate one's attention and action on the tumour only (which we consider the symptom of the real illness) one will be very dependent on killing or removing all and every tumour cells in one strike. Killing and tumour stopping is the only effort undertaken by "school medicine" and also unfortunately of most of "alternative" clinics. If they fail to take out or destroy ALL of them: healing is then impossible. From that point of time on the patient will be in continuous trouble until the end. Most of the time the patient then gets chemotherapy until he or she dies.
The rule of thumb says: "If you are not able to remove all cancer tumour by your first operation you then are in trouble."
The second liability of this effort is that after an opening surgery operation you do not know whether or not you have been able to take out all of cancer. You have to wait and see. (During this time one really should undertake an effort of real healing!) A "to make sure chemotherapy" in this stage is almost always shown a complete useless action. Cancer returns after a while because chemo cannot extinguish 100% of cancer cells (except for a very few cancers like cancer of testicles).
If then after months or sometimes years cancer comes back you are in trouble. In that stage chemotherapy will mostly only be able to produce a short time stop to the tumours, if at all. Life extension of a few weeks is the aim and the hope of doctors ... That's all.
The proof:
This is fine theory. But theory is only that much worth as it is proven to work. In the following case reports all of the listed patients have been treated by one and the same treatment that only addresses the system. It contains a few steps that brings about a recovery of the coordinating systems that are responsible for growth commands. There were no treatments of the cancer tumor itself. I translated and wrote up 15 cases for you. They are severe cases of very progressed cancer. This is not an example for you to wait until you are that far but only an example for the extreme workability of this procedure. You can come and get this therapy here in Vienna. Unfortunately it is not available in America since the FDA prohibited certain elements of this therapy long ago. It is not done anywhere in the world as far as I know.
One liability of this therapy is that it takes a while for the organism to "turn around". You can see that in a few of the following case reports, some patients started to recover only after 6 months. In a case of bone metastases it took 1 year for the lady to be able to walk because the bone had to heal together too.
So unfortunately a patient has to stay for quite a while here. - But Vienna is a nice city anyway ... !
So, please read the case reports. I will continue and finish my essay after the reports.
|
| Case 1: |
Inoperable tumor of left half of the brain. Patient was in very poor state, could not speak, did not respond, was totally incontinent (urine and feces). X-ray showed an enormous enlargement of the right ventricle of the brain, the left ventricle could not be visualized. Therapy was begun. Three months later, patient had much improved, half a year later patient had no symptoms whatsoever. Continued to live in good state for many years. |
| Case 2: |
An angiography was performed on a patient admitted to the neurological university hospital. It revealed a constricting process reaching from the cerebral cortex down into the brain stem. Patient suffered from jacksonian-type seizures every day. Radiation therapy failed entirely. Following radiation, patient even had up to 17 seizures a day. It was difficult for patient to walk or talk, eyeballs were bulging. Treatment started in 1971. After six weeks, patient was without seizures, has remained in good state until now (1980). |
| Case 3: |
Ovarian carcinoma, was diagnosed by histological findings, inoperable, had grown into the rectum. X-ray confirmed intestinal stenosis. Patient was terminally ill, required morphine four times a day. Treatment began in 1953. After six months, patient was symptom-free. Treatment was continued by her general practitioner. Treatment was discontinued in 1965. Patient was still alive in 1977. |
| Case 4: |
Patient diagnosed with cancer-induced intestinal stenosis in 1956. Improved under therapy, but then withdrew. A year later blood was found in the urine. Bladder had cauliflower-like tumor (x-ray). After regular treatment hardly any complaints half a year later (clear x-rays of 1975 prove this point). Patient was still alive in 1980 at age 87 (only had some problems with hip, but was otherwise in a good state). |
| Case 5: |
An 18-year-old young man was operated on by a brain surgeon in 1933. A large glioblastoma (i.e. a malignant brain tumor, generally considered to be incurable) of the cerebellum was found, which could not be excised. The patient was about to die. Because of the increasing intracranial pressure, the patient underwent a trepanation (i.e. a hole had to be drilled into the skull to alleviate the pressure). When the patient started treatment, he was dying. He could neither stand up, nor sit down, was confined to bed, vomited all the time and was only able to babble. He was emaciated and had lost his sense of balance. During the first therapy sessions, he had to vomit every time. This improved only gradually within half a year. Only then was the patient responsive and better able to retain some food. Treatment was continued daily, and the patient's state improved very slowly, he gained weight (10 kg). After one and a half years he had gained 20 kg. He was able to resume his former job. He started traveling and had almost no symptoms, except for some balance disorder which forced him to walk with a cane. Also, there was a minor speech disorder. This was due to the fact that prior to treatment major portions of the cerebellum had been destroyed. The patient was 18 years old when treatment began. He died at age 59. |
| Case 6: |
In 1947, a 46-year-old patient had a tumor on the right ovary, which was surgically removed. In 1952, a carcinoma developed on the uterus. A sample taken revealed this to be a "papillary adenocarcinoma". Since this tumor was inoperable, the patient underwent radiation, but to no avail. In March 1953, doctors diagnosed that the tumor had grown into the rectum. On 1 August 1953, the tumor was seen to have grown into the other side of the intestines as well. The patient lost weight and was under severe pain. In October of the same year, her state was hopeless. Her husband was informed accordingly. She was given morphine, and her stool was thin and hemorrhagic. Therapy was started on this bedridden patient. Six weeks into therapy, she did no longer lose weight, her weight remained the same for two months, whereupon she started to gain weight ever so slowly. After eight weeks she did not need any pain killers any more. After two months, it was possible to enter the previously too contracted rectum with one finger. Four weeks later you could even introduce a rectoscope to see that the rectal wall was covered in tumor masses for up to 10 cm (from bottom). The patient remained without symptoms until 1970. Her gynecological findings had improved as early as in 1960. Since then no more treatment. |
| Case 7: |
On 17 May 1960, the patient underwent an operation to remove a colon carcinoma. This was an orange-size, mucous-producing cylindro-adenoma. At the base of the intestines several bean-size hard glands were palpable. Examinations revealed that those were the metastases of a gelatinous cancer. Treatment began at the end of September. Patient was in very good state until 1974. No further follow-up. |
| Case 8: |
A 27-year-old patient was diagnosed with thyroid carcinoma in 1967, which was surgically removed in August 1968. She then underwent 28 cobalt radiation sessions (i.e. radiation therapy) without success. Roughly one year later, she had breathing difficulties. Laminograms of the lungs showed extensive round shadows around the two lung roots, which grew rapidly. Treatment started on 30 September 1968. The following year, no shadows could be detected any more. The patient had gained weight. The hard lumps, which had previously been palpable in the right supraclavicular fossa, went back. The patient's findings improved. Since then she has felt absolutely well. |
| Case 9: |
The 60-year-old farmer L.J. came for consultation in 1952. He suffered from labored respiration, and his skin was bluish, a condition that had developed over the past months. He was coughing, and there was blood in his sputum. He was unable to negotiate a five-step staircase without help, and even when assisted his respiration was extremely labored. X-ray findings of 10 September 1952: diaphragms with indistinct margins on both sides; in the right lower area small cloudy shadow containing several softer round shades; the right root of the lung was swollen and protruding, the left root was widened; in the right medium and lower part of the lung there was an inhomogeneous mucous cloudiness containing several cherry-size round shadows; in the first upper part of the lung, close to the root and below the clavicle between the first and second anterior ribs, there were two cherry-size round shadows. Diagnosis: cancer-filled lung roots, atelectasis on the left and cherry-size metastases in the right lower part and in the left middle, lower and upper part. No histological examination was performed to clarify the nature of the shadows seen, but several eminent radiologists confirmed that they could only refer to cancerous growths, probably metastases of some undetected primary tumor. Whatever their nature, it is worth noting that those shadows fully disappeared within five years of treatment. In fact, the patient was almost without complaints after a mere six months and could resume his work as a farmer. Whenever treatment was discontinued for several weeks in the first three years, his breathing difficulties re-occurred and only disappeared after two to three weeks of resumed therapy. Patient lived for another ten years in good state and died in an accident. |
| Case 10: |
The 60-year-old farmer Z. was a similar story. He came for consultation because of labored breathing, blood in his sputum and considerable weight loss. The radiologist found a roughly goose egg-sized shadow in the right lung close to the hilar region. The patient seemed to be inoperable. Under our therapy, the shadow became smaller and smaller and was hardly discernible after six months. The patient had gained 18 kg and was able to work in his fields. When he moved to another place in 1952, treatment had to be discontinued. A year later, the tumor had started to grow again. A bronchoscopic examination showed it to be a malignant carcinoma (cancer). This relapse resulted in the patient's death. (This example shows that patients should not completely withdraw from such a therapy.) |
| Case 11: |
Also in the 50-year-old physician, Dr. C., discontinuation of successful treatment led to a relapse. He arrived with mucous effusion in the lung area. A bronchial carcinoma was diagnosed by bronchographic and bronchoscopic examinations performed in the surgical ward of a university hospital. The patient was in a very poor condition. He responded to our therapy within a few weeks, i.e. his status improved and the effusion disappeared against all expectations, as up until then we had not been successful in cancerous processes involving the accumulation of fluid. He even gained enough strength to be able to resume working in his practice and driving his car over greater distances. After six months, he was absolutely symptom-free. Despite repeated warnings he withdrew from therapy. Three months later cancer reoccurred, as predicted, and led to the patient's death. |
| Case 12: |
Heinrich He., born in 1893, farmer and innkeeper. In July 1956, sudden constipation, tearing pain in the hypogastric region, intestinal bleeding. ESR 68/89, delayed evacuation of the large intestines under x-ray. Impossible to fill one section with contrast medium. Treatment started in May 1958, whereupon general condition and bowel movement improved. In September 1958, renewed contrast radiograph of the bowel passage which showed that there was still an area in the sigmoid colon that could not be fully filled with the contrast medium; there was no visualization and an irregular margin of the defect. Incomplete opacification also in the upper part of the descending colon. Treatment was continued, and towards the end of 1959 the patient was symptom-free. Treatment was discontinued because the patient's health fund refused any further reimbursement of treatment-related travel costs. In September 1960, he was again afflicted. In addition, he had trouble with his bladder, cramps in the bladder region, intermittent micturition, flakes and blood in his urine. A cystoscopy revealed polypous, villous growths in the bladder. A follow-up examination performed in the surgical ward confirmed these findings. Rectoscope could not enter more than 15 cm. Clinical diagnosis: carcinoma (cancer) in the colon. Operation was recommended but refused by patient in view of the high risk. in March 1961, cystocscopy: around the right ureteral orifice cauliflower-like soft, slightly hemorrhaging masses without structure, which filled the whole upper side of the bladder. Treatment was resumed in March 1961, whereupon symptoms improved within eight weeks. Patient was then able to pass water without difficulty, he took mild laxatives to have regular bowel movement. Towards the end of November 1962, the patient was symptom-free and able to work again. No pathological changes could be detected in an x-ray performed in 1974 on his intestines. This good status could be maintained - except for an inflammation of the hip joint - to this very day (1980). Patient is still alive. |
| Case 13: |
A patient, born on 24 September 1920, noticed intestinal bleeding in spring 1975. He lost much weight. In 1976, he was diagnosed with rectal cancer, which greatly constricted the lumen. The patient underwent surgery on 24 March 1976 and was given a preternatural anus. A biopsy showed that he had an adenocarcinoma. Also a second surgical intervention on 14 April 1976 did not succeed in removing the tumor. It adhered irremovably to its environment. The left and right lobes of the liver had hard nodes, the artery was surrounded by many smaller nodules. The tumor reached down to the hypogastric region, the lesser pelvis was not accessible to the palpating hand. On 11 May 1976, the patient had lost 12 kg. Nothing but some thin broth left the anal orifice. Within 4 cm, hard nodes all around the rectum. Therapy started on 11 May 1976, first at the hospital and then by the patient's general practitioner. Already on 18 May 1976, he had gained weight (85 kg versus 83 kg), and on 16 July he had 89 kg. Very good condition, anus evacuated normal stool, only the fingertips could still palpate one small nodule. On 29 June 1977 the patient's general practitioner reported: general condition is very good, patient is fit, can drive larger distances himself with his own car. The only remaining symptoms are winds and occasional constipation. Since then no further news. |
| Case 14: |
That "cancer of the lymph nodes" also responds to this treatment is illustrated by the following case: a young woman, born on 13 October 1937, noticed in 1960 greatly enlarged glands on the neck, which first became smaller under red light irradiation. Following a biopsy, she was diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease and given deep x-ray treatment and Endoxane injections (chemotherapy). On 13 June 1962, several soft, not clearly defined lymph nodes were detected on the right side of the neck, while the left side showed a scar from the previous biopsy. The spleen was no longer palpable. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 21/42, i.e. the blood picture was tell-tale. Regular treatment began in June 1962. Since then, no more enlarged glands. The patient married and gave birth to a healthy child. She feels well. Her ESR was 8/25 last time, her hematology measures were normal. |
| Case 15: |
Even in very severe cases, it is sometimes possible to help: the 76-year-old M. El. was hospitalized on 19 June 1958. He was emaciated and in a very poor state. There was blood in his feces, he suffered from severe anemia with 1.8 million erythrocytes, he had to be given blood transfusions. Under our therapy his general condition and hematology measures gradually improved. It took him eight weeks to recover enough to be able to undergo an x-ray examination. It revealed a large recess on the inner curve of the stomach, which could still be seen (though much smaller) in an examination one year later. The patient's condition improved so much that he was again able to care for himself and even go on some errands. Being symptom-free, he did not return for treatment after one year. Two years later he died at the age of 79. |
The above cases are all very severe. Remember: the better the general condition, the greater the likelihood of improvement. We cannot treat any bedridden patients at our center. As a rule, there should be a time of survival of at least half a year at the beginning of treatment.. The above examples may not be interpreted as healing promises. |
|
|
Home
More information for better understanding